
Egyptian television presenter Sarah Khalifa and 11 other defendants have been sentenced to death after a Cairo court convicted them of taking part in an organised network involved in manufacturing and trafficking synthetic drugs. The case involved more than 750 kilograms of narcotics and raw materials, according to Egyptian state linked media. The judgment can still be appealed.
A Cairo Criminal Court has sentenced Egyptian television presenter and media personality Sarah Khalifa and 11 other defendants to death by hanging in one of the country’s most closely watched recent drug cases.
The court found the group guilty of forming an organised criminal network that prosecutors said imported materials from abroad for the manufacture of synthetic drugs and intended to distribute the finished narcotics.
Nine other defendants were sentenced to life imprisonment, while seven were acquitted. The case involved 28 defendants in total.
Egyptian authorities say investigators seized more than 750 kilograms of narcotics and raw materials during the investigation.
They also said residential properties had been used as drug laboratories and that firearms and ammunition were recovered as part of the case.
For Khalifa, the ruling represents an extraordinary fall from a career built in television, entertainment and business.
Khalifa became known in Egypt as a television presenter and media personality and later built a large following on social media.
She is associated with the programme Mission Impossible, which focused on crime and security issues, and she also ran businesses outside broadcasting, including an events company and a cosmetic surgery clinic.
International reporting says she has more than two million followers on Instagram.
Her public profile has helped propel the court case far beyond the normal crime pages in Egypt.
But the substance of the prosecution is more important than her celebrity.
Prosecutors said the defendants operated an organised structure with different members responsible for obtaining materials, manufacturing drugs, storing them and distributing the finished product.
The scale of the alleged operation is one reason the case has attracted such attention.
According to Al Ahram and other Egyptian media, investigators seized more than 750 kilograms of drugs and materials used in their manufacture.
Authorities said two residential apartments were being used as makeshift laboratories.
Prosecutors also alleged that members of the group possessed firearms and ammunition without licences.
The charges eventually brought against Khalifa and the other defendants included importing substances used to manufacture narcotics, manufacturing drugs for trafficking and participating in an organised criminal gang.
The prosecution had earlier asked the court to impose the death penalty.
In August, the court referred Khalifa and several other defendants to Egypt’s Grand Mufti for an advisory religious opinion, a procedural step required in Egyptian capital cases before a death sentence is issued.
The court returned on September 5 with the death sentences.
Khalifa has denied the accusations against her.
During proceedings, she publicly maintained that she had nothing to do with drugs and declared her innocence.
ABC News, citing AFP and Egyptian reporting, said Khalifa reacted emotionally when the sentence was delivered and insisted that she had never used drugs.
Her defence will now have the opportunity to challenge the judgment.
That point is important.
The sentence is severe, but it is not yet the end of the legal process.
Egyptian law allows the defendants to challenge the judgment.
Al Jazeera reports that recent judicial changes provide two avenues of appeal, beginning with a request for retrial before an appeals court before a further possible challenge before the Court of Cassation.
Khalifa should therefore not yet be described as having exhausted all legal remedies.
The correct position is that she has been sentenced to death by a trial court and is expected to appeal.
That distinction matters, particularly in a case receiving this level of international attention.
Egypt retains capital punishment for several offences, including premeditated murder, terrorism and certain serious drug trafficking crimes.
Death sentences require referral to the Grand Mufti for a non binding religious opinion before the court delivers its final ruling.
Egyptian courts continue to issue significant numbers of death sentences each year, although not every sentence is ultimately carried out after appeals and retrials.
The Egyptian Commission for Rights and Freedoms reported hundreds of death sentences in 2025, according to international coverage of Khalifa’s case.
The scale of the Khalifa prosecution has therefore reopened attention on both Egypt’s drug laws and its continued use of capital punishment.
It would be easy to reduce the case to the dramatic fall of a television personality.
That would miss the larger issue.
The prosecution concerns an alleged organised manufacturing and trafficking network operating at considerable scale.
More than 750 kilograms of narcotics and manufacturing materials were reportedly seized.
Twenty eight people were prosecuted.
Twelve received death sentences.
Nine received life imprisonment.
Seven were acquitted.
Those numbers explain why the case matters beyond Khalifa’s personal profile.
It is also a reminder of how seriously Egyptian courts treat organised narcotics offences.
The public attention surrounding Khalifa means every stage of the appeals process is likely to be closely watched.
Her lawyers will seek to overturn or reduce the sentence.
Prosecutors will defend a case they have presented as a major organised drug trafficking operation.
For now, the most important fact is simple.
One of Egypt’s best known television personalities has been sentenced to death alongside 11 others in a case involving hundreds of kilograms of drugs and manufacturing materials.
But the case is not legally finished.
The next chapter will be fought in Egypt’s appeal courts.